Ridgeway v. State
700 So. 2d 100, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11445, 1997 WL 611683
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 1997·No. No. 97-1166·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Carl Ridgeway challenges an order by which his motion, pursuant to Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was summarily denied. Appellant’s motion to allow credit for jail time is facially insufficient. See Wiggins v. State, 654 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Thomas v. State, 634 So.2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to appellant filing a timely motion [101] that comports with the requirements of Rule 3.850(e).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ridgeway v. State, 700 So. 2d 100, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11445, 1997 WL 611683 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
700 So. 2d 100 (Ridgeway v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ridgeway v. State
704 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)