Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ridgeway v. State

Ridgeway v. State

700 So. 2d 100, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11445, 1997 WL 611683
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 7, 1997
DocketNo. 97-1166
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 700 So. 2d 100 (Ridgeway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ridgeway v. State, 700 So. 2d 100, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11445, 1997 WL 611683 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carl Ridgeway challenges an order by which his motion, pursuant to Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was summarily denied. Appellant’s motion to allow credit for jail time is facially insufficient. See Wiggins v. State, 654 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Thomas v. State, 634 So.2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to appellant filing a timely motion [101]*101that comports with the requirements of Rule 3.850(e).

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ridgeway v. State
704 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
700 So. 2d 100, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11445, 1997 WL 611683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridgeway-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.