Ricky Viveiros v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ricky Viveiros v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 10, 2018

Docket5D17-3496

StatusPublished

This text of Ricky Viveiros v. State (Ricky Viveiros v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ricky Viveiros v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RICKY VIVEIROS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-3496

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 14, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Kimberly M. Shepard, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without further discussion, Ricky Viveiros’s judgment and sentence

imposed in this case. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order to

specifically reflect the conditions of violation that the trial court orally announced. See

Lewis v. State, 8 So. 3d 370, 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); Payne v. State, 920 So. 2d 742,

743 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Further, the record reflects two condition 5 violations but the State only proceeded on one condition 5 violation. On remand, the written order should

only reflect the violation for disorderly intoxication. See Kemp v. State, 135 So. 3d 347,

347-48 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with Instructions.

ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI