Payne v. State
This text of 920 So. 2d 742 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael PAYNE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*743 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Michael Payne appeals the order finding him in violation of probation. His sole issue on appeal is that the court failed to enter a written order stating which conditions the court found that he had violated. Payne is correct that such an order is necessary. Brinson v. State, 866 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Payne's probation, but remand for the entry of a proper order.
AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.
PLEUS, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
920 So. 2d 742, 2006 WL 304660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.