Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden. Read the opinion of the Court — 926 F.3d 145
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2018·No. 16-30486·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 16-30486 October 12, 2018 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk RICKY LANGLEY, Petitioner − Appellant v.

HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent − Appellee

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana __________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 14, 2018, 5 Cir., 2018, 890 F.3d 504)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden, (5th Cir. 2018).

Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden (Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden
890 F.3d 504 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)