Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 16-30486 October 12, 2018 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk RICKY LANGLEY, Petitioner − Appellant v.
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent − Appellee
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana __________________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion May 14, 2018, 5 Cir., 2018, 890 F.3d 504)
Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden (Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.