Rickman (Michael) v. Cone Mills Corporation, Cone Mills Marketing Company, Sampson (Ben), Tesher (Donald W.), Vetack (Richard)
893 F.2d 1340, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19797, 1989 WL 160310
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 24, 1989·No. 87-1830·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Rickman (Michael)
v.
Cone Mills Corporation, Cone Mills Marketing Company,
Sampson (Ben), Tesher (Donald W.), Vetack (Richard)
NO. 87-1830
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
OCT 24, 1989
Appeal From: D.Kan., 659 F.Supp. 412
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rickman (Michael) v. Cone Mills Corporation, Cone Mills Marketing Company, Sampson (Ben), Tesher (Donald W.), Vetack (Richard), 893 F.2d 1340, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19797, 1989 WL 160310 (10th Cir. 1989).
893 F.2d 1340 (Rickman (Michael) v. Cone Mills Corporation, Cone Mills Marketing Company, Sampson (Ben), Tesher (Donald W.), Vetack (Richard)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central Kansas Credit Union v. Mutual Guaranty Corp.
886 F. Supp. 1529 (D. Kansas, 1995)
Lester v. Eli Lilly & Co.
893 F.2d 1340 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
Rickman v. Cone Mills Corp.
129 F.R.D. 181 (D. Kansas, 1989)