Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 5, 2019·No. 05-18-00474-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 5, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00473-CR No. 05-18-00474-CR

RICKEY LECARDO MCGEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-34511-H; F16-34499-H

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion to supplement the record. Appellant is

represented by appointed counsel. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation.

See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Appellant’s motion to

supplement is DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State (Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)