Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State
This text of Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State (Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered May 6, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00473-CR No. 05-18-00474-CR
RICKEY LECARDO MCGEE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-34511-H; F16-34499-H
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion to recuse Chief Justice Robert Burns from
the above-numbered appeals. Chief Justice Robert Burns is not on the panel to which the above-
numbered appeals will be submitted, and he will not be a participant in the disposition of these
appeals. Further, it appears appellant is represented by appointed counsel. A criminal defendant
is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2007). Appellant’s motion to recuse is DENIED.
/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rickey-lecardo-mcgee-v-state-texapp-2019.