Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 6, 2019·No. 05-18-00474-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered May 6, 2019 DLB [pic]

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-00473-CR No. 05-18-00474-CR

Rickey Lecardo McGee, Appellant

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-34511-H; F16-34499-H

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion to recuse Chief Justice Robert Burns from the above-numbered appeals. Chief Justice Robert Burns is not on the panel to which the above-numbered appeals will be submitted, and he will not be a participant in the disposition of these appeals. Further, it appears appellant is represented by appointed counsel. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Appellant’s motion to recuse is DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State (Rickey Lecardo McGee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)