Richland Run Homeowners Ass'n v. CHC Durham Corp.
484 S.E.2d 527, 346 N.C. 170, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 216
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with Judge Greene’s dissenting opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richland Run Homeowners Ass'n v. CHC Durham Corp., 484 S.E.2d 527, 346 N.C. 170, 1997 N.C. LEXIS 216 (N.C. 1997).
484 S.E.2d 527 (Richland Run Homeowners Ass'n v. CHC Durham Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Puma Biotechnology, Inc. v. Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo, L.L.P.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
Gaston Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Shelco
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
State of NC v. Ortiz
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019
High Rock Lake Partners, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
693 S.E.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Land v. TALL HOUSE BUILDING CO.
563 S.E.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Knotts-Thomas v. City of Sanford
541 S.E.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)