Richey v. State

76 So. 471, 16 Ala. App. 187, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 244
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1917·No. 7 Div. 450.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for seduction. The indictment changes that Ed Richey, alias, etc., a man, did, by means of temptation, deception, arts, flattery, or promise of marriage, seduce Margarte Tidwell, an unmarried woman, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama. The defendant was convicted on October 16, 1916. The appeal was taken on October 18, 1916. The time for signing and filing:' of the bill of exceptions having expired, arid there appearing no bill of exceptions in the record,' this court will not review the given and refused charges. Mitchell v. State, 15 Ala. App. 109, 72 South. 507; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 South. 36.

The record is without error, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richey v. State, 76 So. 471, 16 Ala. App. 187, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 244 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

76 So. 471 (Richey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
103 So. 479 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Winchester v. State
102 So. 595 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Motley v. State
102 So. 924 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)