Motley v. State
102 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 689
Opinion
The appeal is upon the record, without bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the requested written charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed. Mack v. State, 201 Ala. 269, 77 So. 683; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 So. 36; Richey v. State, 16 Ala. App. 187, 76 So. 471; Franklin v. State, 16 Ala. App. 192, 76 So. 476. We find no error in the record. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Motley v. State, 102 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).
102 So. 924 (Motley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jiles v. State
120 So. 147 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)