Motley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Motley v. State

102 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 689

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 16, 1924

Docket6 Div. 494.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 So. 924 (Motley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Motley v. State, 102 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

The appeal is upon the record, without bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the requested written charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed. Mack v. State, 201 Ala. 269, 77 So. 683; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 So. 36; Richey v. State, 16 Ala. App. 187, 76 So. 471; Franklin v. State, 16 Ala. App. 192, 76 So. 476. We find no error in the record. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, J.

The appeal is upon the record, without bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the requested written charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed. Mack v. State, 201 Ala. 269, 77 So. 683; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 So. 36; Richey v. State, 16 Ala. App. 187, 76 So. 471; Franklin v. State, 16 Ala. App. 192, 76 So. 476. We find no error in the record. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motley-v-state-alactapp-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack