Richardson v. Tate

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Richardson v. Tate

271 So. 2d 260, 1973 La. LEXIS 5463

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 15, 1973·No. No. 53087·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re: T. L. James & Company and National Surety Corporation applying for Cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 269 So.2d 278.

Writ denied. Under the facts found, we find no error of law.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, Moore, the employer of plaintiffs, was an independent contractor and the plaintiffs were not borrowed servants of this defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: T. L. James & Company and National Surety Corporation applying for Cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 269 So.2d 278.

Writ denied. Under the facts found, we find no error of law.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, Moore, the employer of plaintiffs, was an independent contractor and the plaintiffs were not borrowed servants of this defendant.

Richardson v. Tate, 271 So. 2d 260, 1973 La. LEXIS 5463 (La. 1973).

Pincite

271 So. 2d 260 (Richardson v. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related