Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State

53 So. 3d 391, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1082, 2011 WL 335571
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 986 So. 2d 606 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 2011·No. No. 5D10-3592·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Richardson’s Rule 3.800(a)1 motion without prejudice to Richardson’s right to seek additional jail credit pursuant to a legally sufficient motion. See Alfonso v. State, 901 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 53 So. 3d 391, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1082, 2011 WL 335571 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

53 So. 3d 391 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alfonso v. State
901 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)