Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Alfonso v. State

Alfonso v. State

901 So. 2d 939, 2005 WL 957928
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2005·No. 4D05-592·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

901 So.2d 939 (2005)

Raul ALFONSO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-592.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 2005.

Raul Alfonso, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing, if appropriate, either: (1) a Rule 3.800(a) motion that alleges where in the record the information regarding jail time can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to the credit for jail time, see Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); or (2) a properly sworn and pled Rule 3.850 motion, challenging *940 the sentence based on the failure to award jail time credit. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c)(6).

KLEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alfonso v. State, 901 So. 2d 939, 2005 WL 957928 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

901 So. 2d 939 (Alfonso v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. State
53 So. 3d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Santiago v. State
22 So. 3d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Warren v. State
980 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Petscher v. State
936 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)