Alfonso v. State
This text of 901 So. 2d 939 (Alfonso v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raul ALFONSO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Raul Alfonso, Century, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing, if appropriate, either: (1) a Rule 3.800(a) motion that alleges where in the record the information regarding jail time can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to the credit for jail time, see Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); or (2) a properly sworn and pled Rule 3.850 motion, challenging *940 the sentence based on the failure to award jail time credit. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c)(6).
KLEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
901 So. 2d 939, 2005 WL 957928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfonso-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.