Richardson v. State

45 So. 3d 937, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15569, 2010 WL 3985343
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 969 So. 2d 535
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 2010·No. 3D10-1959·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. 1

1

. The appeal is dismissed insofar as it attempts to seek review of the trial court’s order denying the motion to mitigate sentence. See Thomas v. State, 19 So.3d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 45 So. 3d 937, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15569, 2010 WL 3985343 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

45 So. 3d 937 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
19 So. 3d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)