Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State

765 So. 2d 223, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9364, 2000 WL 1021590
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2338·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Anthony Richardson’s convictions but remand with directions that condition (28) of the order of probation be stricken because the trial court orally pronounced that court costs, as well as attorney’s fees, would not be made a condition of probation but would be reduced to a lien.

Affirmed, but remanded for correction of probation order.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and ISOM, CLAUDIA R., Associate Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 765 So. 2d 223, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9364, 2000 WL 1021590 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 223 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Creech v. ORLANDO LEASING SYSTEMS
765 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)