Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richardson v. State

537 So. 2d 713, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 361, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 455, 1989 WL 7506

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 1989

DocketNo. 87-1750

StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 713 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. State, 537 So. 2d 713, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 361, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 455, 1989 WL 7506 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Richardson’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon. The trial court was justified in exceeding the guideline recommendation based on Richardson’s repeated violations of probation and community control in this case. Pullens v. State, 516 So.2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We do find, however, that the court erred in imposing costs without notice and the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment in proper fashion.

[714]*714AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Richardson’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon. The trial court was justified in exceeding the guideline recommendation based on Richardson’s repeated violations of probation and community control in this case. Pullens v. State, 516 So.2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We do find, however, that the court erred in imposing costs without notice and the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment in proper fashion.

[714]*714AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 713, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 361, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 455, 1989 WL 7506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack