Richardson v. State

492 So. 2d 847, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1817, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 523 So. 2d 746
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 1986·No. No. BK-49·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The order denying Richardson’s motion for post-conviction relief is AFFIRMED. We agree with the trial court that Richardson has failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel. We also agree that Richardson cannot attack his consecutive mandatory minimum sentences, but not for the reason relied upon by the trial court. Contrary to the trial court’s position, Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983), may be applied retroactively to Richardson’s sentences. Moore v. State, 464 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). However, Richardson’s argument based on Palmer could have been addressed on direct appeal and is therefore not cognizable by motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Bass v. State, 478 So.2d 461 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review granted, Case No. 68,230 (Fla. July 7, 1986) (oral argument set for October 27, 1986).

MILLS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 492 So. 2d 847, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1817, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

492 So. 2d 847 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. State
464 So. 2d 1296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Palmer v. State
438 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Bass v. State
478 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)