Richardson v. State

697 S.W.2d 913, 287 Ark. 259, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2219

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 292 Ark. 140 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 28, 1985·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Avery Nathan Richardson, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Carl J. Madsen, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeal in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Á copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Avery Nathan Richardson, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Carl J. Madsen, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

Á copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Richardson v. State, 697 S.W.2d 913, 287 Ark. 259, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2219 (Ark. 1985).

Pincite

697 S.W.2d 913 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.