Richardson v. State
This text of 695 S.W.2d 379 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant has moved for a rule on the clerk to permit the late filing of the record and docketing of appeal in this criminal case.
Although the motion states “the attorney” miscalculated the time for perfecting the appeal, it does not say who the responsible attorney was.
We will grant the rule on the clerk and permit the docketing of the appeal upon receipt of a proper motion accompanied by an affidavit from an attorney accepting responsibility for the failure to file the record on time. See per curiam order of February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 S.W.2d 379, 287 Ark. 38, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-ark-1985.