Richardson v. State
This text of 112 So. 193 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After affirmance by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the circuit court, on the authority of Ex parte State ex rel. v. Richardson (Ala. App.) 111 So. 202, 1 and In re Richardson v. State (Ala. Sup.) 111 So. 204, 2 the appellant, without making application for rehearing in the Court of Appeals, filed the petition for certiorari. This was not a compliance with the rule in such cases, and the motion of the state to dismiss the' petition will be granted. Supreme Court rule 44, Code of 1923, p. 894.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 So. 193, 215 Ala. 581, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-ala-1927.