Richardson v. State
112 So. 193, 215 Ala. 581, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 607
Opinion
After affirmance by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the circuit court, on the authority of Ex parte State ex rel. v. Richardson (Ala. App.) 111 So. 202, 1 and In re Richardson v. State (Ala. Sup.) 111 So. 204, 2 the appellant, without making application for rehearing in the Court of Appeals, filed the petition for certiorari. This was not a compliance with the rule in such cases, and the motion of the state to dismiss the' petition will be granted. Supreme Court rule 44, Code of 1923, p. 894.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. State, 112 So. 193, 215 Ala. 581, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 607 (Ala. 1927).
112 So. 193 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. State
154 So. 2d 302 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Cofield v. State
153 So. 2d 252 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Accardo v. State
105 So. 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Birmingham Gas Co. v. Sanders
162 So. 532 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)