Cofield v. State

153 So. 2d 252, 275 Ala. 174, 1963 Ala. LEXIS 587
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 9, 1963
Docket3 Div. 68
StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 2d 252 (Cofield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cofield v. State, 153 So. 2d 252, 275 Ala. 174, 1963 Ala. LEXIS 587 (Ala. 1963).

Opinion

COLEMAN, Justice.

This petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals does not show that application has been made to said court for a rehearing of the point or decision complained of and that said application has been decided adversely to the movant.

The overruling of an application for rehearing by that court is a condition precedent to a review by this court under Supreme Court Rule 39(44). Richardson v. State, 215 Ala. 581, 112 So. 193; Birmingham Gas Co. v. Sanders, 230 Ala. 649, 162 So. 532; Wilkerson v. State, 246 Ala. 542, 21 So.2d 622; Accardo v. State, 268 Ala. 293, 105 So.2d 865.

Because the condition precedent has not been satisfied, certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Accardo v. State
105 So. 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Wilkerson v. State
21 So. 2d 622 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Birmingham Gas Co. v. Sanders
162 So. 532 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Richardson v. State
112 So. 193 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 So. 2d 252, 275 Ala. 174, 1963 Ala. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cofield-v-state-ala-1963.