Richardson v. Millard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richardson v. Millard

33 A.D.2d 820, 305 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 820 (Richardson v. Millard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Millard, 33 A.D.2d 820, 305 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Schenectady County, granting respondent’s motion for permission to serve an amended complaint to add G. E. Van Vorst Co., Inc., as a party defendant in this action. The instant appeal was taken by William H. Millard and not G. E. Van Vorst Co. Millard is not a party aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 by the order adding an additional defendant (7 Weinstein-HornMiller, N. V. Civ. Frac., par. 5511.08). Accordingly, the appeal is improperly taken and must, therefore, be dismissed (Matter of Cannon, 278 App. Div. 742). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J. P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Schenectady County, granting respondent’s motion for permission to serve an amended complaint to add G. E. Van Vorst Co., Inc., as a party defendant in this action. The instant appeal was taken by William H. Millard and not G. E. Van Vorst Co. Millard is not a party aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 by the order adding an additional defendant (7 Weinstein-HornMiller, N. V. Civ. Frac., par. 5511.08). Accordingly, the appeal is improperly taken and must, therefore, be dismissed (Matter of Cannon, 278 App. Div. 742). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J. P.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 820, 305 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-millard-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack