Richardson v. Millard

33 A.D.2d 820, 305 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1969·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Reynolds, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Schenectady County, granting respondent’s motion for permission to serve an amended complaint to add G. E. Van Vorst Co., Inc., as a party defendant in this action. The instant appeal was taken by William H. Millard and not G. E. Van Vorst Co. Millard is not a party aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 by the order adding an additional defendant (7 Weinstein-HornMiller, N. V. Civ. Frac., par. 5511.08). Accordingly, the appeal is improperly taken and must, therefore, be dismissed (Matter of Cannon, 278 App. Div. 742). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J. P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Millard, 33 A.D.2d 820, 305 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

33 A.D.2d 820 (Richardson v. Millard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrylo v. Metro Fuel Oil Corp.
276 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Caballero v. Caballero
247 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Kearney v. GVGHA (Genesee Valley Group Health Ass'n)
125 Misc. 2d 716 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Giordano v. Grand Prix Sales, Service, Restoration Co.
113 Misc. 2d 395 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Connell v. Hayden
83 A.D.2d 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Pinto v. House
79 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)