Caballero v. Caballero

247 A.D.2d 352, 667 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 889
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 352 (Caballero v. Caballero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caballero v. Caballero, 247 A.D.2d 352, 667 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 14, 1997, which granted the plaintiff wife’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint to add Maria Caballero and Paula Caballero, the defendant’s sisters, as necessary parties.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Only an “aggrieved party or a person substituted for him may appeal from any appealable judgment or order” (CPLR [353]*3535511; see, Matter of Richmond County Socy. for Prevention of Cruelty to Children [Staten Is. Mental Health Socy.], 11 AD2d 236, 239, affd 9 NY2d 913, motion to amend remittitur granted 10 NY2d 746, cert denied 368 US 290; M.J. & K. Co. v Matthew Bender & Co., 220 AD2d 488, 489). In the instant matter the defendant husband was not aggrieved by the order adding his sisters as necessary party defendants. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Gomberg v Gorman, 117 AD2d 583, 584; Richardson v Millard, 33 AD2d 820).

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Weaver
2018 NY Slip Op 5136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Heckler Electric Co. v. Matrix Exhibits-New York, Inc.
278 A.D.2d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Patrylo v. Metro Fuel Oil Corp.
276 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 352, 667 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caballero-v-caballero-nyappdiv-1998.