Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richards v. State

616 So. 2d 621, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4174, 1993 WL 113414

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 608 So. 2d 917 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1993·No. No. 92-1783·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court imposing restitution against appellant. However, the trial court erred when it twice included the sum of $900.00 for repainting of an automobile. Therefore, we reverse the amount awarded and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to deduct $900.00 from the amount of restitution.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court imposing restitution against appellant. However, the trial court erred when it twice included the sum of $900.00 for repainting of an automobile. Therefore, we reverse the amount awarded and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to deduct $900.00 from the amount of restitution.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Richards v. State, 616 So. 2d 621, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4174, 1993 WL 113414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

616 So. 2d 621 (Richards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.