Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richards v. State

564 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5265, 1990 WL 102669

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 24, 1990

DocketNo. 87-1339

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 261 (Richards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. State, 564 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5265, 1990 WL 102669 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the assessment of costs for lack of notice to the defendant and opportunity to be heard on his ability to pay. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

As in Vamper v. State, 562 So.2d 816 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), we certify the question decided herein as one of great public importance.

We find no merit to the other points raised and thus affirm the defendant’s convictions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the assessment of costs for lack of notice to the defendant and opportunity to be heard on his ability to pay. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

As in Vamper v. State, 562 So.2d 816 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), we certify the question decided herein as one of great public importance.

We find no merit to the other points raised and thus affirm the defendant’s convictions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5265, 1990 WL 102669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack