Richards v. Smith

Fifth Circuit

Richards v. Smith

276 F.2d 652, 3 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 848

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1960

DocketNo. 18081

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 276 F.2d 652 (Richards v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. Smith, 276 F.2d 652, 3 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 848 (5th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In three civil actions brought for injuries to or death of the plaintiffs or those they represent, consolidated for trial, the court below rendered summary judgment in favor of some of the defendants, but left the actions pending as to others. This appeal is from that order.

Being of the opinion that, under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1291 and 1292 and the decisions of this Court in Meadows v. The Greyhound Corp., 1956, 235 F.2d 233, King v. The California Co., 1955, 224 F.2d 193 (opinion on rehearing, 1956, 236 F.2d 413), and New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. B. L. Jones & Co., 1958, 254 F.2d 917, the judgment appealed from is not a final judgment from which appeal may be prosecuted, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte.

. , Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In three civil actions brought for injuries to or death of the plaintiffs or those they represent, consolidated for trial, the court below rendered summary judgment in favor of some of the defendants, but left the actions pending as to others. This appeal is from that order.

Being of the opinion that, under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1291 and 1292 and the decisions of this Court in Meadows v. The Greyhound Corp., 1956, 235 F.2d 233, King v. The California Co., 1955, 224 F.2d 193 (opinion on rehearing, 1956, 236 F.2d 413), and New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. B. L. Jones & Co., 1958, 254 F.2d 917, the judgment appealed from is not a final judgment from which appeal may be prosecuted, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte.

. , Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 F.2d 652, 3 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-smith-ca5-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack