Richard v. State

345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1074, 2011 WL 3586508
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 16, 2011
DocketED 95229
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 S.W.3d 400 (Richard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard v. State, 345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1074, 2011 WL 3586508 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karl Richard (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mays v. State
345 S.W.3d 400 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1074, 2011 WL 3586508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-v-state-moctapp-2011.