Mays v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mays v. State

345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 2011 WL 3586510

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 16, 2011

DocketED 95260

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 S.W.3d 400 (Mays v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mays v. State, 345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 2011 WL 3586510 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Mays appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and *401 the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Mays appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and *401 the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 2011 WL 3586510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mays-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack