Mays v. State
345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 2011 WL 3586510
Opinion
ORDER
Frederick Mays appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and *401 the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mays v. State, 345 S.W.3d 400, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 2011 WL 3586510 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
345 S.W.3d 400 (Mays v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richard v. State
345 S.W.3d 400 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)