Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND EN BANC RECONSIDERATION
Appellate case name: Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins, deceased
Appellate case number: 01-19-00703-CV
Trial court case number: 441165
Trial court: Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County
Appellant, Richard Stephen Calkins, has filed a motion for rehearing and en banc reconsideration. The panel has voted to deny appellant’s motion for rehearing. The en banc court has voted to deny appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration. Accordingly, it is ordered that appellant’s motion for rehearing and en banc reconsideration is denied.
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Lloyd, and Landau.
En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, and Adams. Justice Countiss not sitting
Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sarah B. Landau________________ Acting for the En Banc Court
Date: December 17, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins (Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.