Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 24, 2020·No. 01-19-00703-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION TO RECUUSE

Appellate case name: Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins, deceased

Appellate case number: 01-19-00703-CV

Trial court case number: 441165

Trial court: Probate Court No 2 of Harris County

Appellant, Richard Steven Calkins, has filed a motion to recuse Justice Sarah B. Landau from this appeal. Justice Landau declined to recuse and certified the motion to recuse to the remainder of the en banc court.* See TEX. R. APP. P. 16.3(b). The remainder of the en banc court voted unanimously to deny the motion. It is ordered that appellant’s motion to recuse is denied.

Judge’s signature: _______/s/ Sherry Radack____________________ Chief Justice Radack, Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: March 24, 2020

* The remainder of the en banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, and Hightower. Justice Countiss not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins (Richard Stephen Calkins v. Carolyn Calkins James and Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Mary Olive Hull Calkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.