Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2024
Docket15-24-00066-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency (Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 15-24-00066-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/19/2024 1:51 PM NO. 15-24-00066-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AUSTIN, TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/19/2024 1:51:00 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk

RICHARD MARK DUDLEY AND DEANIE PALMER DUDLEY v. TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY

ON APPEAL FROM THE 272nd DISTRICT COURT BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 18-001737-CV-272

APPELLANTS RICHARD MARK DUDLEY AND DEANIE PALMER DUDLEY’S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF

COMES NOW, RICHARD MARK DUDLEY and DEANIE PALMER

DUDLEY, Appellants, and file this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File

Appellants’ Reply Brief and would respectfully show unto the Court the following:

I. Present Deadline

The current deadline to file the Appellants’ Reply Brief is January 6, 2025.1

1 The Appellee’s Brief was accepted for filing on December 16, 2024, and Appellants received notice that the reply brief would be due 20 days from that date. The 20th day from that date is January 5, 2025, which is a Sunday, so the deadline is extended to the following Monday pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a).

1 II. Length of Extension Sought

Appellants request a 21-day extension to file their Reply Brief, from Monday,

January 6, 2025 to Monday, January 27, 2025.

III. Number of Previous Extensions Granted

This is the first extension that Appellants have requested with respect to their

Appellants’ Reply Brief. Appellants previously received one 29-day extension to file

their Appellants’ Brief. Appellee previously received four extensions to file their

Appellee’s Brief (for a combined 70-day extension).

IV. Facts Explaining Needed Extension

Appellee’s numerous extensions of time to file its Appellee’s brief has resulted

in Appellants’ reply brief being due on January 6, 2025. Because of the timing of the

Christmas and New Year’s Day holidays as well as the annual vacation of Appellant’s

counsel’s office during that time period, Appellants are unable to complete their

Reply Brief by that January 6, 2025 deadline.

Additionally, Appellants’ counsel has been engaged in or has scheduled,

among other things, the following matters necessitating an extension to the requested

January 27 date:

• Attendance at a status hearing on December 16, 2024 in Cause Nos. 991-G and 992-G; In the Guardianship of Gaz Climer, an Alleged Incapacitated Adult and In the Guardian of Jade Climer, an Alleged

2 Incapacitated Adult, In the County Court at Law No. 1, Brazos County, Texas, with the outcome that permanent guardianship applications and additional investigation must be completed on an expedited basis;

• Drafting and filing a Preliminary Report pursuant to court order by December 16, 2024 in Cause Nos. 991-G and 992-G; In the Guardianship of Gaz Climer, an Alleged Incapacitated Adult and In the Guardian of Jade Climer, an Alleged Incapacitated Adult, In the County Court at Law No. 1, Brazos County, Texas;

• Preparation for and attendance at a hearing on December 17, 2024 in Cause No. 18930-PC; In the Estate of Angel Morales Delgado, III, Deceased; In the County Court at Law No. 2, Brazos County, Texas;

• Drafting correspondence relating to children’s access to their mother for the holiday period and speaking with expert witnesses (with limited availability) for preparation of contested temporary orders hearing in Cause No. 15-003100-CVD-272; In the Interest of RLB and RCB, Children; In the 272nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas;

• Preparation of proposed Agreed Final Decree of Divorce in Cause No. 24-003270-CVD-CCL2; In the Matter of the Marriage of Jamie Lee Loveless and Francisco Alejandro Montiel Ishino; In the County Court at Law No. 2, Brazos County, Texas;

• Preparation of Docket Control Order due by January 6, 2025 or case will be dismissed for want of prosecution in Cause No. 18059-PC; In the Estate of Micky Gwynn Rigby, Deceased; In the County Court at Law No. 1 of Brazos County, Texas;

• Response due on January 6, 2025 for motion for partial summary judgment in Cause No. 23-000937-CV-472; William Marden v. Serenity Roofing & Construction, Inc., In the 472nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas, with a hearing set on that motion for January 13, 2025;

• Discovery responses due on January 9, 2025 in Cause No. 24-002423- CVD-472; In the Matter of the Marriage of Amy Claire Stivers and Scott

3 Stivers and in the Interest of C.E.S., a Child; In the 472nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas.

• Preparation for and attendance at a hearing on January 9, 2025 in Cause No. 8371; In the Estate of Francis Dickman; In the County Court of Robertson County, Texas.

• Preparation for and attendance at a bench trial on January 14, 2025 in Cause No. 23-002152-CV-472 In the Interest of ASB, a Child; In the District Court, Brazos County, Texas;

• Deadline of January 16, 2025 (after two previous extensions that combined to previously extend that deadline by 118 days) to file Appellant’s Brief in Case No. 10-24-00225-CV; Dudley Construction, Ltd. v. Cross Roads Concrete Services, Inc.; in the Tenth Court of Appeals, Waco, Texas.

• Preparation for and attendance at mediation on January 17, 2025 in Cause No. 24-002423-CVD-472; In the Matter of the Marriage of Amy Claire Stivers and Scott Stivers and in the Interest of C.E.S., a Child; In the 472nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas.

• Preparation for and attendance at hearing on January 21, 2025 for plaintiff’s motion to reinstate in Cause No. 16-14560; D. Wellmann Trucking, LLC v. Dudley Construction, Ltd., in the 12th District Court, Madison County, Texas;

• Preparation for and attendance at bench trial on January 22, 2025 in Cause No. 21-002329-CV-CCL2; Natalie May Moore v. Autowerks CSTX, LLC; In the County Court at Law No. 2, Brazos County, Texas.

Other deadlines and activity during this time period includes demand letters,

drafting original petitions, transactional issues, and preparation of discovery

responses. Furthermore, one of Appellants’ appellate attorneys has been sick with

4 strep throat, and he was out of the office on December 13, 2024.

Accordingly, in light of the foregoing, Appellants’ counsel requires more time

to prepare their reply brief. This request is not made for improper purposes of delay

but so that justice may be done.

V. Authority to Grant Extension of Time

The Court may grant an extension of time to file an appellate brief under the

authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d). This motion is filed within

the deadline to file a motion to extend time to file Appellants’ Reply Brief as required

by Rule 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

CONCLUSION

The Court should extend the time for filing Appellants’ Reply Brief for a

twenty-one day extension to Monday, January 27, 2025 to allow sufficient time for

Appellants’ attorney to prepare the reply brief.

PRAYER

For these reasons, Appellants request that this Court issue an order as follows:

1. Extend the time for filing Appellants’ reply brief for twenty-one (21) days, until Monday, January 27, 2025.

5 Respectfully submitted,

THE SWEARINGEN LAW FIRM ROBERT A. SWEARINGEN, P.C.

By: /s/Robert A. Swearingen Robert A. Swearingen State Bar Number 19563050 Byron D.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-mark-dudley-and-deanie-palmer-dudley-v-texas-municipal-power-texapp-2024.