Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency
This text of Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency (Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 15-24-00066-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/27/2025 2:14 PM NO. 15-24-00066-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AUSTIN, TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/27/2025 2:14:16 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
RICHARD MARK DUDLEY AND DEANIE PALMER DUDLEY v. TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
ON APPEAL FROM THE 272nd DISTRICT COURT BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 18-001737-CV-272
APPELLANTS RICHARD MARK DUDLEY AND DEANIE PALMER DUDLEY’S UNOPPOSED SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF
COMES NOW, RICHARD MARK DUDLEY and DEANIE PALMER
DUDLEY, Appellants, and file this Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time
to File Appellants’ Reply Brief and would respectfully show unto the Court the
following:
I. Present Deadline
The current deadline to file the Appellants’ Reply Brief is January 27, 2025.
1 II. Length of Extension Sought
Appellants request a 2-day extension to file their Reply Brief, from Monday,
January 27, 2025 to Wednesday, January 29, 2025.
III. Number of Previous Extensions Granted
This is the second extension that Appellants have requested with respect to
their Appellants’ Reply Brief. Appellants previously received one 29-day extension
to file their Appellants’ Brief and one 21-day extension to file their reply brief.
Appellee previously received four extensions to file their Appellee’s Brief (for a
combined 70-day extension).
IV. Facts Explaining Needed Extension
Additionally, Appellants’ counsel has been engaged in or has scheduled,
among other things, the following matters necessitating an extension to the requested
January 29 date:
• Response due on January 6, 2025 for motion for partial summary judgment in Cause No. 23-000937-CV-472; William Marden v. Serenity Roofing & Construction, Inc., In the 472nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas, with a hearing set on that motion for January 13, 2025;
• Discovery responses due on January 9, 2025 in Cause No. 24-002423- CVD-472; In the Matter of the Marriage of Amy Claire Stivers and Scott Stivers and in the Interest of C.E.S., a Child; In the 472nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas.
2 • Preparation for and attendance at a hearing on January 9, 2025 in Cause No. 8371; In the Estate of Francis Dickman; In the County Court of Robertson County, Texas.
• Preparation for and attendance at a bench trial on January 14, 2025 in Cause No. 23-002152-CV-472 In the Interest of ASB, a Child; In the District Court, Brazos County, Texas;
• Drafting Appellant’s Brief in Case No. 10-24-00225-CV; Dudley Construction, Ltd. v. Cross Roads Concrete Services, Inc.; in the Tenth Court of Appeals, Waco, Texas.
• Preparation for and attendance at mediation on January 17, 2025 in Cause No. 24-002423-CVD-472; In the Matter of the Marriage of Amy Claire Stivers and Scott Stivers and in the Interest of C.E.S., a Child; In the 472nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas.
• Preparation of discovery responses and expert disclosures in a complex family law matter due on January 28, 2025, in Cause No. 15-003100-CVD-272; In the Interest of RLB and RCB, Children; In the 272nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas;
• Preparation of discovery supplementation and court-ordered disclosures on January 24 and January 27, 2025 in Cause No. 23-000937-CV-472; William Marden as Trustee of Marden Family Revocable Living Trust v. Serenity Roofing & Construction, Inc.; In the 472nd District Court, Brazos County, Texas.
Accordingly, in light of the foregoing, Appellants’ counsel requires more time
to prepare their reply brief. This request is not made for improper purposes of delay
but so that justice may be done. This Court has provided notice that this case is set
for submission on Wednesday, February 19, 2025. The requested extension will not
affect that submission date or otherwise cause a delay.
3 V. Authority to Grant Extension of Time
The Court may grant an extension of time to file an appellate brief under the
authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d). This motion is filed within
the deadline to file a motion to extend time to file Appellants’ Reply Brief as required
by Rule 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
CONCLUSION
The Court should extend the time for filing Appellants’ Reply Brief for a two
day extension to Wednesday, January 29, 2025 to allow sufficient time for
Appellants’ attorney to prepare the reply brief.
PRAYER
For these reasons, Appellants request that this Court issue an order as follows:
1. Extend the time for filing Appellants’ reply brief for two (2) days, until Wednesday, January 29, 2025.
4 Respectfully submitted,
THE SWEARINGEN LAW FIRM ROBERT A. SWEARINGEN, P.C.
By: /s/Robert A. Swearingen Robert A. Swearingen State Bar Number 19563050 Byron D. Thompson State Bar Number 24051698 3002 Texas Avenue South College Station, Texas 77845-5048 (979) 680-9993 ~ Telephone (979) 680-9991 ~ Facsimile Robert@swearingenlaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS RICHARD MARK DUDLEY DEANIE PALMER DUDLEY
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I certify that I have conferred with Frederick D. Junkin, attorney for Appellee Texas Municipal Power Agency, via email on January 27, 2025, Mr. Junkin stated in an email response on that date that Appellee was unopposed to the relief sought in this motion.
/s/ Byron D. Thompson BYRON D. THOMPSON
5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on January 27, 2025, I served a copy of this document, Appellants Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley’s Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Reply Brief, on the following lead counsel for all parties to the trial court’s Judgment, who are listed below, by electronic service and that the electronic transmission was reported as complete. My e-mail address is robert@swearingenlaw.com
Frederick D. Junkin State Bar No. 11058030 fred.junkin@phelps.com Phelps Dunbar LLP 910 Louisiana Street, Suite 4300 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 877-5508 (713) 626-1388 (Fax) Attorney for Appellee Texas Municipal Power Agency via electronic service
/s/ Robert A. Swearingen ROBERT A. SWEARINGEN
6 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Swearingen Law Firm - Legal Secretary on behalf of Robert Swearingen Bar No. 19563050 robert@swearingenlaw.com Envelope ID: 96637915 Filing Code Description: Motion Filing Description: Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellants' Reply Brief Status as of 1/27/2025 2:24 PM CST
Associated Case Party: Texas Municipal Power Agency
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
Sarah Strickland SARAH.STRICKLAND@PHELPS.COM 1/27/2025 2:14:16 PM SENT
Nichole Impastato nichole.impastato@phelps.com 1/27/2025 2:14:16 PM SENT
Case Contacts
Robert A.Swearingen robert@swearingenlaw.com 1/27/2025 2:14:16 PM SENT
Byron Thompson byron@swearingenlaw.com 1/27/2025 2:14:16 PM SENT
Frederick Junkin fred.junkin@phelps.com 1/27/2025 2:14:16 PM SENT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Mark Dudley and Deanie Palmer Dudley v. Texas Municipal Power Agency, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-mark-dudley-and-deanie-palmer-dudley-v-texas-municipal-power-texapp-2025.