Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00511-CV
Richard L. PEREZ, Appellant
v.
CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CV00521 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2022
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by October 24, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion
for extension of time has been filed. Therefore, on November 30, 2022, this court ordered appellant
to file, no later than December 12, 2022, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining:
(1) his failure to timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s
failure to timely file a brief. Our order cautioned appellant that if he failed to timely file a brief
and the written response by December 12, 2022, we would dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary 04-22-00511-CV
dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order). Appellant did not respond to our November
30th order. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A. (Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.