Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 28, 2022·No. 04-22-00511-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00511-CV

Richard L. PEREZ, Appellant

v.

CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CV00521 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2022

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by October 24, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion

for extension of time has been filed. Therefore, on November 30, 2022, this court ordered appellant

to file, no later than December 12, 2022, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining:

(1) his failure to timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s

failure to timely file a brief. Our order cautioned appellant that if he failed to timely file a brief

and the written response by December 12, 2022, we would dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary 04-22-00511-CV

dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order). Appellant did not respond to our November

30th order. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A. (Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.