Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 30, 2022·No. 04-22-00511-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 30, 2022

No. 04-22-00511-CV

Richard L. PEREZ, Appellant

v.

CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CV00521 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by October 24, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to file, no later than December 12, 2022, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) his failure to timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response by December 12, 2022, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order).

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of November, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A. (Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.