Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.
This text of Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A. (Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 30, 2022
No. 04-22-00511-CV
Richard L. PEREZ, Appellant
v.
CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CV00521 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by October 24, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to file, no later than December 12, 2022, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) his failure to timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response by December 12, 2022, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order).
_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of November, 2022.
___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard L. Perez v. Citibank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-l-perez-v-citibank-na-texapp-2022.