Richard J. Rosiak v. Yp, LLC
This text of Richard J. Rosiak v. Yp, LLC (Richard J. Rosiak v. Yp, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ September 17, 2018
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A19A0259. RICHARD J. ROSIAK v. YP, LLC.
Richard J. Rosiak filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss. However, we lack jurisdiction. The order at issue is interlocutory in nature. See MNM 5 v. Anderson/6438 Northeast Partners, Ltd., 215 Ga. App. 407, 408 (1) (451 SE2d 788) (1994) (denial of a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory ruling). “A party seeking appellate review from an interlocutory order must follow the interlocutory application procedure . . ., which includes obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court.” Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assocs., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828) (1994); see also OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Rosiak’s failure to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over his appeal, which is therefore DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/17/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard J. Rosiak v. Yp, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-j-rosiak-v-yp-llc-gactapp-2018.