Richard Coakley v. Mari Coakley
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00142-CV
Richard Coakley, Appellant
v.
Mari Coakley, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-09-005199, ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER PER CURIAM
Pro se appellant Richard Coakley filed his notice of appeal on February 27, 2013.
He requested and received three extensions of time to file his brief, which was due April 2, 2014,
but the brief has not been filed. Appellant has filed a motion for a fourth extension of time, which
appellee Mari Coakley opposes, seeking an additional thirty days to file his brief.
We grant the motion for extension of time in part and order appellant
Richard Coakley to file his brief no later than April 17, 2014. If the appellant’s brief is not filed by
that date, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1),
42.3(a), (c).
It is ordered on April 7, 2014.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Coakley v. Mari Coakley (Richard Coakley v. Mari Coakley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.