Richard Coakley v. Mari Coakley

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 8, 2014·No. 03-13-00142-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00142-CV

Richard Coakley, Appellant

v.

Mari Coakley, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-09-005199, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard Coakley filed his notice of appeal on February 27, 2013. Appellant requested

and received four extensions of time to file his brief. On April 7, 2014, we ordered appellant to

file his brief by April 17, 2014, and informed him that this appeal was subject to dismissal for

want of prosecution if he did not file the brief by that date. Appellant has failed to file his brief.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: May 8, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Coakley v. Mari Coakley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Richard Coakley v. Mari Coakley (Richard Coakley v. Mari Coakley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.