Richard Burt v. President of University of Florida
Opinion
dht the
United States Court of Appeals Hour the Eleventh Circuit
No. 23-12616
RICHARD BURT,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus PRESIDENT OF UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, DAVID E. RICHARDSON, MARY WATT, SIDNEY DOBRIN, Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-00075-MW-HTC
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, CHIEF JUDGE, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL Pryor, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, BRASHER, ABUDU, and Kipp, Circuit Judges.
USCA11 Case: 23-12616 Document: 62-1 Date Filed: 10/08/2025 Page: 2of2
2 Order of the Court 23-12616
BY THE COURT:
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Burt v. President of University of Florida (Richard Burt v. President of University of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.