Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp.

Supreme Court

Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp.

330 U.S. 810, 67 S. Ct. 1079

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 31, 1947

DocketNo. 470; No. 471; No. 472; No. 473

StatusPublished

This text of 330 U.S. 810 (Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp., 330 U.S. 810, 67 S. Ct. 1079 (1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Counsel for the petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471 having suggested that one of the copartners of the firm of Daniel F. Rice & Co., to wit: Walter T. Rice, died on June 8, 1946, and that said firm has been reconstituted with the addition of Joseph A. Fagan as a partner and member thereof, it is ordered that the writs of certiorari be dismissed as to Walter T. Rice and that Joseph A. Fagan be, and he hereby is, made a party petitioner in Nos. 470 and 471. Counsel for the petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471 having further suggested that respondent [811]*811Great Lakes Elevator Corporation has abandoned its service as a warehouse and public storer of grain for hire, it is ordered that the writs of certiorari in Nos. 470 and 472 be dismissed as to respondent Great Lakes Elevator Corporation.

Lee A. Freeman for petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Counsel for the petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471 having suggested that one of the copartners of the firm of Daniel F. Rice & Co., to wit: Walter T. Rice, died on June 8, 1946, and that said firm has been reconstituted with the addition of Joseph A. Fagan as a partner and member thereof, it is ordered that the writs of certiorari be dismissed as to Walter T. Rice and that Joseph A. Fagan be, and he hereby is, made a party petitioner in Nos. 470 and 471. Counsel for the petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471 having further suggested that respondent [811]*811Great Lakes Elevator Corporation has abandoned its service as a warehouse and public storer of grain for hire, it is ordered that the writs of certiorari in Nos. 470 and 472 be dismissed as to respondent Great Lakes Elevator Corporation.

Lee A. Freeman for petitioners in Nos. 470 and 471.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 U.S. 810, 67 S. Ct. 1079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-great-lakes-elevator-corp-scotus-1947.