Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp.

Supreme Court

Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp.

329 U.S. 701, 67 S. Ct. 115, 91 L. Ed. 612

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 21, 1946·No. No. 470; No. 471; No. 472; No. 473·Published

Opinion

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals [702]*702for the Seventh Circuit granted.

Lee A. Freeman for Daniel F. Rice et al.; petitioners in Nos. 470, 471, 472 and 473. George F. Barrett, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for the Illinois Commerce Commission et al., petitioners in Nos. 472 and 473. Ferre C. Watkins, Floyd E. Thompson, Carl Meyer, Leo F. Tierney and Louis A. Kohn for respondents in Nos. 470 and 472. Weymouth Kirkland and Howard Ellis for respondent in Nos. 471 and 473. Briefs were filed by Frederick G. Hamley and John E. Benton for the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, as amicus curiae, in support of the petitions in Nos. 470 and 471, and by Everett C. McKeage and H. F. Wiggins for the Railroad Commission of California, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 470.

Reported below: 156 F. 2d 33.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals [702]*702for the Seventh Circuit granted.

Lee A. Freeman for Daniel F. Rice et al.; petitioners in Nos. 470, 471, 472 and 473. George F. Barrett, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for the Illinois Commerce Commission et al., petitioners in Nos. 472 and 473. Ferre C. Watkins, Floyd E. Thompson, Carl Meyer, Leo F. Tierney and Louis A. Kohn for respondents in Nos. 470 and 472. Weymouth Kirkland and Howard Ellis for respondent in Nos. 471 and 473. Briefs were filed by Frederick G. Hamley and John E. Benton for the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, as amicus curiae, in support of the petitions in Nos. 470 and 471, and by Everett C. McKeage and H. F. Wiggins for the Railroad Commission of California, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 470.

Reported below: 156 F. 2d 33.

Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp., 329 U.S. 701, 67 S. Ct. 115, 91 L. Ed. 612 (1946).

Pincite

329 U.S. 701 (Rice v. Great Lakes Elevator Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related