Ricco v. State

624 So. 2d 872, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10646, 1993 WL 416245
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1993·No. No. 93-2633·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order denying appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion, and further reverse his conviction and sentence on the authority of Phillips v. State, 623 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). See also State v. Williams, 623 So.2d 462 (Fla.1993). On remand, appellant is to be discharged.

As the state agrees that this result is mandated under Phillips, we dispense with the time for filing motions for rehearing and direct that a mandate issue forthwith.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricco v. State, 624 So. 2d 872, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10646, 1993 WL 416245 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

624 So. 2d 872 (Ricco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. State
623 So. 2d 621 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Williams
623 So. 2d 462 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)