Phillips v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Phillips v. State

614 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1993 WL 88652

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 1993

DocketNo. 90-1576

StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 1224 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. State, 614 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1993 WL 88652 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON MANDATE

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Pursuant to a mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida, the judgment and opinion of this court, filed August 30, 1991, 585 So.2d 412, wherein appellant’s convictions of first-degree murder, kidnapping, robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony were affirmed, is hereby set aside. The opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, Phillips v. State, 612 So.2d 557 (Fla. 1992), reversing appellant’s convictions and vacating his sentences based on a determination that his motion to suppress statements had improperly been denied, is hereby adopted as this court’s opinion and judgment. Consequently, appellant’s convictions are reversed due to the trial court s error m denying the motion to suppress, his sentences are vacated and this cause is remanded for a new trial. We find no error in the remaining points raised by appellant.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON MANDATE

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Pursuant to a mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida, the judgment and opinion of this court, filed August 30, 1991, 585 So.2d 412, wherein appellant’s convictions of first-degree murder, kidnapping, robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony were affirmed, is hereby set aside. The opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, Phillips v. State, 612 So.2d 557 (Fla. 1992), reversing appellant’s convictions and vacating his sentences based on a determination that his motion to suppress statements had improperly been denied, is hereby adopted as this court’s opinion and judgment. Consequently, appellant’s convictions are reversed due to the trial court s error m denying the motion to suppress, his sentences are vacated and this cause is remanded for a new trial. We find no error in the remaining points raised by appellant.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1993 WL 88652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack