Ricci v. Destefano

264 F. App'x 106
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 2008
DocketNo. 06-4996-cv
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 264 F. App'x 106 (Ricci v. Destefano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ricci v. Destefano, 264 F. App'x 106 (2d Cir. 2008).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.) granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts.

We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in the thorough, thoughtful, and well-reasoned opinion of the court below. In this case, the Civil Service Board found itself in the unfortunate position of having no good alternatives. We are not unsympathetic to the plaintiffs’ expression of frustration. Mr. Ricci, for example, who is dyslexic, made intensive efforts that appear to have resulted in his scoring highly on one of the exams, only to have it invalidated. But it simply does not follow that he has a viable Title VII claim. To the contrary, because the Board, in refusing to validate the exams, was simply trying to fulfill its obligations under Title VII when confronted with test results that had a disproportionate racial impact, its actions were protected.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Christa Mcauliffe Intermediate School Pto v. De Blasio
364 F. Supp. 3d 253 (S.D. Illinois, 2019)
Ricci v. DeStefano
530 F.3d 88 (Second Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 F. App'x 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ricci-v-destefano-ca2-2008.