Ricardo Pedraza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 21, 2014·No. 04-13-00238-CR·Published

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2014

No. 04-13-00238-CR

Ricardo PEDRAZA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CRR107-D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 12, 2013, we abated the appeal to the trial court pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8. We ordered the supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record to be filed on or before January 13, 2014. Thereafter, the court coordinator filed a letter asking for an extension of time in which to hold the abandonment hearing. We then ordered the trial court to file the supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records no later than February 14, 2014.

On February 19, 2014, the trial court filed an additional motion for extension of time, in which it indicated that the hearing was conducted on February 14, 2014, but requesting that it be allowed until March 21, 2014 to file the supplemental records. The motion is DENIED. The trial court is ORDERED to file the supplemental reporter’s record from the February 14, 2014 hearing as well as the supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings regarding our December 12, 2013 abatement order NO LATER THAN MARCH 3, 2014.

All appellate deadlines are ABATED pending further orders from this court.

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of February, 2014.

Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricardo Pedraza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Ricardo Pedraza v. State (Ricardo Pedraza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.