Ricardo Pedraza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 12, 2014·No. 04-13-00238-CR·Published

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 12, 2014

No. 04-13-00238-CR

Ricardo PEDRAZA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CRR107-D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 12, 2013, we abated this cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). A supplemental clerk’s record and a supplemental reporter’s record of the abandonment hearing have been filed. The trial court found that appellant is indigent and desires to pursue his appeal. The court further found that attorney Fausto Sosa is currently representing appellant and has not abandoned the appeal.

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this appeal on the docket of this court.

Appellant’s brief is due 30 days from the date of this order.

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of March, 2014.

Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ricardo Pedraza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Ricardo Pedraza v. State (Ricardo Pedraza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.