Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rhodes v. State

Rhodes v. State

722 So. 2d 888, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15072, 1998 WL 842668
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rhodes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 704 So. 2d 1080 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1998·No. No. 98-1052·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the instant motion, the Defendant claims that he was not awarded sufficient credit for time served both towards his original probationary period, and towards his subsequent prison sentence. The defendant was released from prison and is not currently on probation. However, if the Defendant was not awarded the proper credit for time served, his corrected sentence should be reflected on the record. Crews v. State, 502 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Thus, this case is hereby remanded to the trial court for an appropriate determination of the Defendant’s sentencing credit. Knox v. State, 692 So.2d 296 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1997).

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhodes v. State, 722 So. 2d 888, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15072, 1998 WL 842668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

722 So. 2d 888 (Rhodes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knox v. State
692 So. 2d 296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Crews v. State
502 So. 2d 1360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)