Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rhodes v. State

Rhodes v. State

717 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11553, 1998 WL 601337
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 11, 1998
DocketNo. 98-2147
StatusPublished

This text of 717 So. 2d 144 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhodes v. State, 717 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11553, 1998 WL 601337 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in not granting the petitioner’s motion to recuse. See Edwards v. State, 712 So.2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Stephney v. State, 564 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition. Because we are confident that the trial judge will promptly comply with this court’s opinion, we withhold formal issuance of the writ.

WRIT GRANTED.

COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephney v. State
564 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Edwards v. State
712 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11553, 1998 WL 601337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.