Rhodes v. State

717 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11553, 1998 WL 601337
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1998·No. No. 98-2147·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in not granting the petitioner’s motion to recuse. See Edwards v. State, 712 So.2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Stephney v. State, 564 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition. Because we are confident that the trial judge will promptly comply with this court’s opinion, we withhold formal issuance of the writ.

WRIT GRANTED.

COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhodes v. State, 717 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11553, 1998 WL 601337 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

717 So. 2d 144 (Rhodes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephney v. State
564 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Edwards v. State
712 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)