Rhodes v. State
This text of 597 So. 2d 974 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael Anthony RHODES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
*975 PER CURIAM.
Appellant brings this appeal from his conviction for purchase of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. The record demonstrates that the crack cocaine purchased by appellant from an undercover Broward County Sheriff's officer during a reverse sting was manufactured by the Broward County Sheriff's Office. Therefore we reverse appellant's conviction and sentence on the authority of Kelly v. State, 593 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Grissett v. State, 594 So.2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). This case is remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge appellant.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 So. 2d 974, 1992 WL 98809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.