Rhodes v. State

655 So. 2d 192, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5586, 1995 WL 312615
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1995·No. No. 94-0466·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction, but reverse the judgment for prospective appellate costs, and remand with direction to strike them.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhodes v. State, 655 So. 2d 192, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5586, 1995 WL 312615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 192 (Rhodes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Nifakos
655 So. 2d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)