Rhoden v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rhoden v. State

249 S.W.3d 240, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 450, 2008 WL 850202

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 2008

DocketED 90067

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 S.W.3d 240 (Rhoden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhoden v. State, 249 S.W.3d 240, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 450, 2008 WL 850202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cecil Rhoden (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentia-ry hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. This Court affirmed Movant’s convictions, following a jury trial, for five counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062, RSMo 2000, 1 and two counts of statutory sodomy in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.064, in Movant’s direct appeal. State v. Rhoden, 201 S.W.3d 70 (Mo.App. E.D.2006).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed fact and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no precedential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI